Feedback Collection Template
Structured approach to gathering and analyzing feedback from users and stakeholders throughout the design process.
Feedback Collection Strategy
Collection Points:
- Prototype testing (early design)
- Mid-development review
- Beta testing (near completion)
- Post-launch review
- Long-term usage feedback
Target Audience:
- Primary users: _____________________________________________________
- Secondary users: ___________________________________________________
- Stakeholders: _______________________________________________________
Prototype Feedback Form
Feedback Session Information
- Feedback Date: _________________________
- Tester Name: _________________________
- Tester Role: _________________________
- Prototype Version: _________________________
- Session Duration: _________________________
Section 1: First Impressions (5 minutes)
Initial Reactions:
-
“What is your first impression of this design?”
-
-
“Is it what you expected?”
- More than expected [ ] As expected [ ] Less than expected
- Explanation: ________________________________________________
-
“Would you use this?”
- Definitely [ ] Maybe [ ] No [ ] Not sure
- Why? __________________________________________________________
Section 2: Usability (15 minutes)
Using the Product:
-
“Can you show me how you would use this?”
- (Observe: difficulties, hesitations, confusion)
- Notes: _________________________________________________________
-
“Was it easy to understand how to use?”
- Very easy [ ] Easy [ ] Neutral [ ] Difficult [ ] Very difficult
- What was confusing? _______________________________________________
-
“Are there any parts that don’t work well together?”
-
Specific Usability Issues:
| Issue | Severity | Suggestion |
|---|---|---|
| High/Med/Low | ||
| High/Med/Low |
Section 3: Functionality Assessment (10 minutes)
Does it do what it’s supposed to?
| Feature/Function | Works Well | Works OK | Doesn’t Work | Needed But Missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | ||||
| - | ||||
| - |
Critical Functions:
- Most important for your use: ________________________________________
- Missing capability: _________________________________________________
Section 4: Physical Design Assessment (10 minutes)
Appearance & Feel:
Visual Design:
- Appealing [ ] Acceptable [ ] Unappealing [ ] Doesn’t matter
- Suggestions: _______________________________________________________
Size & Comfort:
- Too large / Just right / Too small (circle one)
- Weight: Too heavy / Just right / Too light (circle one)
- Comfort feedback: __________________________________________________
Material & Texture:
- Appropriate: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Uncertain
- Feel: _____________________________________________________________
- Durability concern: _________________________________________________
Color/Finish:
- Appropriate: [ ] Yes [ ] No
- Preference: ________________________________________________________
Section 5: Performance & Reliability (10 minutes)
During Testing:
-
“Did it work consistently?”
- Always [ ] Usually [ ] Sometimes [ ] Never
- Issues experienced: ______________________________________________
-
“How solid/durable does it feel?”
- Very durable [ ] Durable [ ] Adequate [ ] Fragile [ ] Very fragile
- Concerns: _______________________________________________________
-
“Any parts that seem weak?”
-
Section 6: Overall Satisfaction (5 minutes)
Scoring Matrix:
| Criterion | Rating | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Overall satisfaction | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| Likely to recommend | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| Meets my needs | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| Design quality | 1 2 3 4 5 | |
| Value for cost | 1 2 3 4 5 |
(1=Poor, 5=Excellent)
Section 7: Suggestions & Improvements (10 minutes)
Open-Ended Feedback:
-
“What would make this better?”
-
-
“What should we change?”
-
-
“What should we keep as-is?”
-
-
“Would you buy/use this?”
- Yes [ ] Maybe [ ] No
- Why? __________________________________________________________
Suggestions Priority:
| Suggestion | Priority | Category | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| High/Med/Low | Design/Function/Material | Easy/Med/Hard | |
| High/Med/Low | Design/Function/Material | Easy/Med/Hard |
Section 8: Accessibility Check (5 minutes)
If applicable to your product:
-
“Can someone with limited vision use this?”
- Yes [ ] With difficulty [ ] No
- How: __________________________________________________________
-
“Can someone with limited mobility use this?”
- Yes [ ] With difficulty [ ] No
- How: __________________________________________________________
-
“Are there any accessibility barriers?”
-
Post-Testing Notes
Tester Behavior Observations: (What did you notice about how they used it?)
Surprises: (Anything unexpected?)
Key Insights:
Critical Issues Found:
Non-Critical Issues:
Feedback Analysis (After Multiple Sessions)
Common Themes
Frequently Mentioned Issues:
- _________________________________________ (Mentioned by ___ of ___% testers)
- _________________________________________ (Mentioned by ___ of ___%)
- _________________________________________ (Mentioned by ___ of ___%)
Frequently Praised Aspects:
Data Summary
| Metric | Average | Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Satisfaction | ___/5 | - | // |
| Likelihood to Recommend | ___/5 | - | // |
| Meets Needs | ___/5 | - | // |
| Usability Rating | ___/5 | - | // |
Priority Action Items
Must Fix (High Priority - blocks usage):
-
- Impact if not fixed: ______________________________________________
-
- Impact if not fixed: ______________________________________________
Should Fix (Medium Priority - improves experience):
Nice to Have (Low Priority - enhancements):
Design Changes Resulting from Feedback
| Original Design | Feedback | Change Made | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
Follow-Up Actions
Immediate Actions:
- Fix critical issues: _______________________________________________
- Notify stakeholders: ______________________________________________
- Update design document: ___________________________________________
Next Test Cycle:
- Schedule follow-up testing
- Prepare updated prototype
- Revise feedback form if needed
Timeline for Changes:
- Critical fixes by: ___________________________________________________
- Medium priority by: __________________________________________________
- Low priority by: ____________________________________________________
Stakeholder Communication
Share findings with:
- Design team
- Stakeholders
- User community
- Management
Format for sharing:
- Summary report
- Presentation
- Video highlights
- Detailed documentation
Feedback Tracking
Overall Feedback Summary:
| Test Round | Date | # Testers | Key Finding | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prototype V1 | ||||
| Prototype V2 | ||||
| Beta |
Sign-Off
Feedback Session Conducted By: ____________________ Analysis Completed By: ____________________ Reviewed By: ____________________
Status:
- Feedback incorporated into design
- Partial incorporation (note: __________________________)
- Under review (decision pending)
- Declined (reason: _______________________________________)
Session Documentation Date: ____________________ Feedback Database Location: ____________________