The prototype clearly and effectively solves the stated problem. All functional requirements are met. The solution shows evidence of testing against the requirements.
2
The prototype mostly meets the problem. Most functional requirements are met. Minor gaps between the design and the requirements.
1
The prototype partially addresses the problem. Several functional requirements are not met or were not clearly tested.
0
The prototype does not address the stated problem, or no functional requirements were established.
The design is original, well-considered, and technically executed. Code (if applicable) is clean, uses variables/modules appropriately, and is well-commented. The print is clean and well-made. Evidence of at least one meaningful revision or iteration.
2
The design is functional and shows thought. Code works but may lack structure (few comments, raw numbers instead of variables). Print quality is acceptable. Some iteration evident.
1
The design is basic or primarily borrowed from another source without modification. Code has issues. Print quality has significant defects that were not addressed.
0
No meaningful original design. Print is not functional or was not completed.
All required sections are present, complete, and specific. Reflections are thoughtful and reference specific decisions, problems encountered, and learning. Photos are included. Measurements are recorded.
2
Most required sections are present. Some sections are vague or missing detail. Reflections show some thought but are brief or generic.
1
Documentation is incomplete. Major sections are missing or consist of one-line responses. Reflections are minimal.
0
Documentation is not submitted or is essentially empty.